Spencer Pratt, the former mayoral candidate, has ignited a fiery debate with his recent social media tirade against what he calls 'commie brutalist slop' in Los Angeles' skyline. In a series of posts on X, Pratt unleashed his passion for architecture, particularly the Art Deco style, which he believes should define the city's aesthetic.
Pratt's critique centers around the Eastern Columbia Building, a stunning Art Deco masterpiece constructed during the Great Depression. He praises its beauty, craftsmanship, and historical significance, highlighting its rapid construction amidst economic hardship. In contrast, he lambasts the (W)rapperofficetower in Culver City, designed by Eric Owen Moss, as an example of 'ugliness' and 'slop'.
The (W)rapperofficetower, with its unconventional design, is a stark departure from the uniformity of the Eastern Columbia Building. Moss, the architect, argues that this design encourages creativity and open-mindedness, offering a unique experience for potential tenants. However, Pratt sees it as an eyesore, a 'stain on our skyline' that detracts from the city's beauty.
Pratt's passion for Art Deco architecture extends beyond aesthetics. He believes it should be the city's defining aesthetic, a symbol of beauty and pride. He argues that the Art Deco style, with its grandeur and attention to detail, inspires and captivates, making it the ideal choice for Los Angeles.
This controversy raises deeper questions about the role of architecture in shaping a city's identity and the importance of preserving historical and aesthetic values. While some may see Pratt's stance as a narrow-minded obsession, others might find it a call to action to protect and celebrate the unique character of Los Angeles.
As the debate rages on, one thing is clear: Spencer Pratt's passion for architecture and his desire to see Los Angeles embrace its beauty have sparked a much-needed conversation about the city's future and the role of design in shaping its destiny.
